1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/beefytech/Beef.git synced 2025-06-09 20:12:21 +02:00

Better case expression parsing, better enum errors

This commit is contained in:
Brian Fiete 2022-02-13 21:55:31 -05:00
parent ce8899f1a7
commit 322b83d1c6
3 changed files with 25 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -8246,6 +8246,20 @@ BfTypedValue BfExprEvaluator::CheckEnumCreation(BfAstNode* targetSrc, BfTypeInst
if (argValue) if (argValue)
{ {
if ((argValue.mType->IsRef()) && (argValue.mType->GetUnderlyingType() == resolvedFieldType))
{
if (auto unaryOperator = BfNodeDynCast<BfUnaryOperatorExpression>(argValues.mResolvedArgs[tupleFieldIdx].mExpression))
{
mModule->Fail(StrFormat("Invalid use of '%s'. Enum payloads can only be retrieved through 'case' expressions.", BfGetOpName(unaryOperator->mOp)), unaryOperator->mOpToken);
argValue = mModule->GetDefaultTypedValue(resolvedFieldType);
}
else if (auto varDecl = BfNodeDynCast<BfVariableDeclaration>(argValues.mResolvedArgs[tupleFieldIdx].mExpression))
{
mModule->Fail("Invalid variable declaration. Enum payloads can only be retrieved through 'case' expressions.", varDecl);
argValue = mModule->GetDefaultTypedValue(resolvedFieldType);
}
}
// argValue can have a value even if tuplePtr does not have a value. This can happen if we are assigning to a (void) tuple, // argValue can have a value even if tuplePtr does not have a value. This can happen if we are assigning to a (void) tuple,
// but we have a value that needs to be attempted to be casted to void // but we have a value that needs to be attempted to be casted to void
argValue = mModule->Cast(argValues.mResolvedArgs[tupleFieldIdx].mExpression, argValue, resolvedFieldType, wantConst ? BfCastFlags_WantsConst : BfCastFlags_None); argValue = mModule->Cast(argValues.mResolvedArgs[tupleFieldIdx].mExpression, argValue, resolvedFieldType, wantConst ? BfCastFlags_WantsConst : BfCastFlags_None);

View file

@ -2571,7 +2571,7 @@ BfExpression* BfReducer::CreateExpression(BfAstNode* node, CreateExprFlags creat
} }
if (caseExpr->mCaseExpression == NULL) if (caseExpr->mCaseExpression == NULL)
{ {
auto expr = CreateExpressionAfter(caseExpr, (CreateExprFlags)(CreateExprFlags_NoAssignment | CreateExprFlags_PermissiveVariableDecl)); auto expr = CreateExpressionAfter(caseExpr, (CreateExprFlags)(CreateExprFlags_NoAssignment | CreateExprFlags_PermissiveVariableDecl | CreateExprFlags_EarlyExit));
if (expr == NULL) if (expr == NULL)
continue; continue;
MEMBER_SET(caseExpr, mCaseExpression, expr); MEMBER_SET(caseExpr, mCaseExpression, expr);

View file

@ -1124,15 +1124,16 @@ bool BfPassInstance::WantsRangeRecorded(BfSourceData* bfSource, int srcIdx, int
if (bfSource == NULL) if (bfSource == NULL)
return true; return true;
if (!mErrors.IsEmpty()) //TODO: Was this useful, or does 'var' resolution do this better?
{ // if (!mErrors.IsEmpty())
// If the last error had a range that was a subset of this one, then just keep the first error // {
// This helps reduce cascading errors to their root cause // // If the last error had a range that was a subset of this one, then just keep the first error
auto lastError = mErrors.back(); // // This helps reduce cascading errors to their root cause
if ((lastError->mSource == bfSource) && (isWarning == lastError->mIsWarning) && (isDeferred == lastError->mIsDeferred) && // auto lastError = mErrors.back();
(lastError->mSrcStart >= srcIdx) && (lastError->mSrcEnd <= srcIdx + srcLen)) // if ((lastError->mSource == bfSource) && (isWarning == lastError->mIsWarning) && (isDeferred == lastError->mIsDeferred) &&
return false; // (lastError->mSrcStart >= srcIdx) && (lastError->mSrcEnd <= srcIdx + srcLen))
} // return false;
// }
// Don't record errors that have already occurred at this location // Don't record errors that have already occurred at this location
BfErrorBase checkError; BfErrorBase checkError;